Footnote 2 In this context, according to one of Romizi's central arguments, an “implicit scientific determinism” emerged that possessed a realistically interpreted mathematical-geometrical core defined by the works of Laplace and Leibniz and specified by universally valid laws and certain principles. Given this background, she argues that the complex and multi-layered history of the concept of scientific determinism had its starting point in the early modern period in the course of developing classical mechanics, which, in natural philosophy, was underpinned by a rationalist understanding of science as an axiomatic-deductive system. In the first part, she explains the concept of scientific determinism in terms of its firmness (mathematical, inductive, statistical), profundity or ontological commitment (fixed, pragmatic, normative, realist), and broadness (systems, laws, descriptions, worldview). B.: 1989, Laws and Symmetries, Clarenden Press, Oxford.Romizi, in her comprehensive study, which is divided into three parts, challenges this so-called received opinion. C.: 1980, The Scientific Image, Clarenden Press, Oxford. Silverberg, A.: 1996, 'Psychological Laws and Non-Monotonic Logic', Erkenntnis 44, 199-144. Reprinted 1991, Ridgeview Press, Atasacadero, CA. Sellars,W.: 1963, Science, Perception and Reality, Humanities Press, New York. Salmon (ed.), Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1971. Salmon, W.: 1970, 'Statistical Explanation', reprinted in W. Rosenberg, A.: 1992, Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? University of Chicago Press, Chicago. and Rey, G.: 1995, 'When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 81-110. Persky, J.: 1990, 'Ceteris Paribus', Journal of Economic Perspectives 4, 187-193. Paige, J.: 1975, Agrarian Revolutions, Free Press, New York. Musgrave, A.: 1980, 'Wittgensteinian Instrumentalism', Theoria 45(6), 65-105. Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals, Harvard Univesity Press, MA. Lange, M.: 1995, 'Are There Natural Laws Concerning Particular Biological Species?' Journal of Philosophy 92, 430-451. Lange, M.: 1993a, 'Natural Laws and the Problem of Provisos', Erkenntnis 38, 233-248. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. Lakatos, I.: 1970, 'Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs', in I. Kincaid, H.: 1996, Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Kincaid, H.: 1990, 'Defending Laws in the Social Sciences', Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 20, 56-83. Salmon (eds.), The Limits of Deductivism, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA., pp. G.: 1988, 'Provisos: A Problem Concerning the Inferential Function of Scientific Laws', in A. W.: 1938, The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory, Macmillan, London. M.: 1992, The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Salmon (eds.), The Limits of Deductivism, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. Giere, R.: 1988, 'Laws, Theories, and Generalizations',"in A. A.: 1991, 'You Can Fool Some of the People All the Time, Everything Else Being Equal Hedged Laws and Psychological Explanations', Mind 100, 19-34. D.: 1998, 'Exorcist XIV: The Wrath of Maxwell's Demon'," Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, in press.įodor, J. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Ĭartwright, N.: 1995, ' Ceteris Paribus Laws and Socio-Economic Machines', Monist 78, 276-297.Ĭartwright, N.: 1997, 'Where Do the Laws of Nature Come From?' Dialectica 51, 65-78.Įarman, J. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Ĭartwright, N.: 1989, Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Ĭartwright, N.: 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie. 45-81.Ĭarrier, M.: 1998, 'In Defense of Psychological Laws', International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12, 217-232.Ĭarroll, J.: 1994, Laws of Nature. (eds.), Concepts, Theories and Rationality in the Biological Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.īeatty, J.: 1995, 'The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis', in J.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |